There are seven serious AI visibility platforms on the market right now. They range from $29/month (Otterly) to $499/month (Profound), and most small business owners pick the wrong one — or worse, buy any of them before they've done a single thing that would actually create the citations the tool is supposed to measure.
This is an honest comparison of every meaningful tool in the category, plus a direct answer to the question almost nobody asks first: do I need a tracking tool at all, or do I need someone to do the work?
Tracking Tools vs. Fix-It Services
The single most important distinction in this category — the one the market gets wrong on almost every comparison post — is the difference between observability and implementation.
Tracking tools tell you whether AI platforms are citing you. They run simulated queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Copilot, log the responses, and show you a dashboard of your share of voice. They do not write your schema. They do not submit your sitemap to Bing. They do not claim your Yelp listing. They do not build a single citation. They watch.
The trap: Spending $499/mo to watch your invisibility is not a strategy. If you are at zero citations today, every dollar that goes to tracking is a dollar not going to the work that creates citations. Tools are the rear-view mirror — not the engine.
That doesn't make tracking tools bad. Once you've done the implementation, monitoring becomes essential — you want to know which queries trigger your name, which competitors are eating your share of voice, and whether last month's content push moved the needle. The question is just one of sequencing: implementation first, observation second.
With that framing, here's an honest look at every tool worth considering, organised by who actually benefits.
Self-Serve Tracking ($29-$60/mo)
For DIY operators who have already implemented schema and citations and now need to monitor what's working. These are the right tools for solo trades, lawyers, dentists and clinic owners tracking 5-20 high-intent queries.
-
Otterly.AI $29/mo4.9/5 on G2. Tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot citations with share-of-voice reporting and a weekly digest. The clear value pick for small business — accurate, fast, and priced like a Netflix subscription.
-
Peec AI $39/moVery similar feature set to Otterly. Slightly weaker historical data and a less mature dashboard, but credible. Reasonable backup if Otterly somehow doesn't fit.
-
Mention $41-$149/moBrand mention monitoring across the web — not citation-specific. Useful if you want a single tool that watches social, press and AI together, but you'll miss the deep LLM-level granularity Otterly and Peec provide.
-
SE Ranking $103/moTraditional SEO platform with an AI tracking add-on. Worth it if you already need rank tracking, keyword research and competitor analysis. Overkill if AI visibility is your only need.
Agency / Mid-Market ($150-$499/mo)
This tier exists for marketing teams and agencies managing multiple brands, product lines, or client accounts. The added cost buys breadth — more LLMs tracked, larger query volumes, multi-brand dashboards, and richer competitive analysis.
-
AthenaHQ ~$249/moUnified GEO command center tracking 8+ LLMs. Strong UX, good prompt management, designed for agencies running comparative analysis across multiple client accounts. The most defensible mid-tier pick.
-
Profound $499/moEnterprise sentiment analysis and share-of-voice across LLMs. Built for marketing teams managing major brands. Powerful, but the weakest fit for small business — you pay for breadth you'll never use.
-
Scrunch AI ~$179/moStrong for category analysis — understanding how AI describes your entire vertical, not just your brand. Good if you're a category leader trying to defend share or a challenger trying to enter the conversation.
Enterprise ($1K+/mo)
The bolt-on tier. Two of the biggest SEO platforms have added AI visibility modules to their existing suites. They're decent if you already pay for the parent product. They're a poor primary purchase.
-
Semrush AI Toolkit $140-$500+/moBolted onto the Semrush platform. Decent AI mention tracking if you already pay for Semrush. Do not subscribe to Semrush solely for the AI toolkit — Otterly does the AI piece better, alone.
-
Ahrefs Brand Radar $129-$449+/moSame logic as Semrush. Brand Radar is a useful add-on if Ahrefs is already part of your stack, weak as a standalone reason to buy Ahrefs.
-
Custom enterprise (Profound Enterprise, etc.) $2K-$15K/moMulti-brand, multi-region, multi-language deployments with custom prompts and API access. Real value if you're an in-house enterprise team. Stop reading this guide and call sales.
What None of Them Do
Tracking tools do not write your schema. They do not submit your sitemap to Bing. They do not build directory citations. They do not create FAQ content. They do not get you reviews. They observe. To move from invisible to cited, you need implementation — not observation.
This is not a knock on the tools. It's a clarification of what category they're in. Otterly, Profound, Peec, AthenaHQ, Scrunch — all of them — are analytics products. Buying one before you've built the underlying authority is like buying a Strava subscription before you own running shoes.
The work that actually creates AI citations is unglamorous: LocalBusiness schema in your <head>, NAP-consistent listings across 50+ directories, FAQPage markup on every service page, reviews flowing in monthly, fresh content answering the exact questions your customers ask. None of that ships from a dashboard.
Tool-by-Tool Comparison Table
| Tool | Monthly cost | Platforms tracked | Best for | Does the work? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otterly.AI | $29 | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot | Solo trades, dentists, lawyers | No — tracking only |
| Peec AI | $39 | 4 major LLMs | Small biz backup pick | No — tracking only |
| Mention | $41-$149 | Web + social + AI mentions | PR / brand teams | No — monitoring only |
| SE Ranking | $103 | SEO + AI add-on | SEO-led marketers | No — tracking only |
| Scrunch AI | ~$179 | 5-6 LLMs + category | Category challengers | No — tracking only |
| AthenaHQ | ~$249 | 8+ LLMs | Agencies, multi-brand | No — tracking only |
| Profound | $499 | All major LLMs + sentiment | Enterprise SOV | No — tracking only |
| We Get Found | $197-$1,497 | All 7 LLMs | Done-for-you, all verticals | Yes — implementation |
When Tools Make Sense
There are exactly three scenarios where a tracking tool is the right next purchase. Honest advice — these are the only three.
-
You've already done the implementation. Schema deployed, all major directories claimed, 150+ Google reviews, 10+ FAQs published, Bing index confirmed. Buy Otterly at $29/mo to monitor. This is the textbook fit.
-
You're an agency with 5+ active clients. Buy AthenaHQ at ~$249/mo, or build a workflow on top of Otterly with one seat per client. You need multi-brand dashboards and white-label reporting.
-
You're an enterprise with brand SOV concerns. Buy Profound. The sentiment analysis and share-of-voice rollups across LLMs are genuinely best-in-class at this tier, and the price is a rounding error against your marketing budget.
When Tools Don't Make Sense (The Trap)
-
You're at zero citations today. Tracking $0 every month doesn't move it to $1. The graph stays flat until someone does the underlying work.
-
You don't have LocalBusiness schema. Spending $29-$499 on tracking is like buying a fitness tracker before joining the gym. The number on the screen is real. It will not change because you bought the watch.
-
You're a small business spending >$200/mo on tracking. That money should go to the work. Directory submissions, schema deployment, FAQ content production, review generation. Every dollar there compounds. Every dollar in a $499/mo dashboard evaporates.
Buying a citation tracker before you have citations is like buying a Bloomberg terminal before you have a portfolio. The dashboard works perfectly. It just has nothing to display.
The Done-For-You Alternative — What Implementation Actually Costs
If the conclusion from the previous two sections is "I don't have the underlying authority yet," the honest next step is to either build it yourself (we have a complete guide for that) or have someone do it. For context, here's what an implementation service costs versus assembling the work yourself.
The math worth pausing on: the Get Found tier at $597/mo replaces a tracking subscription plus the labour stack required to actually produce citations. Roughly:
What $597/mo replaces: Otterly tracking ($29) + 6-12 hours/week of your own time + a freelancer schema writer ($300) + a directory submission VA ($150) + content writer ($600) — roughly $1,100/mo of equivalent labour and tools, plus the calendar weeks of coordination overhead.
Frequently Asked Questions
Find out where you actually stand — then decide what to buy
Run the free AI Visibility Diagnostic first. It gives you roughly the same baseline data as Otterly's first week — citation status, schema audit, Bing index check — for $0. If you're already past diagnostic and ready for implementation, jump straight to the Get Found tier.
Diagnostic takes 60 seconds · No signup needed · Free forever